thanks for your reply. I normally look at the Yahoo list of splits but this 
list is not always complete,

regards, ed



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: gary 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:55 PM
  Subject: Re: [quotes-plus] changes in the database



  There is no list you can look at.

  There can be a lot of changes on any day, yesterday, a lot of dead symbols 
were deleted.

  Here are the recent splits:

  SYMBOL,DATE,NEWQUAN,OLDQUAN
  VIVO  ,5/14/2007,3,2
  GENRD ,5/15/2007,1,6
  AOGS  ,5/15/2007,1,20
  AAA   ,5/15/2007,69.75,25.12999916
  INSP  ,5/16/2007,24.59000015,18.29000092
  MZ    ,5/16/2007,1,10
  NXY   ,5/16/2007,2,1
  FCEN  ,5/16/2007,1.5,1
  EWNR  ,5/16/2007,10,1
  TPC   ,5/16/2007,1,10
  CECB  ,5/17/2007,2,1
  RDDI  ,5/17/2007,2,1
  IBOC  ,5/17/2007,1.100000024,1
  CZNB  ,5/18/2007,1.049999952,1
  IBOC  ,5/19/2007,1.100000024,1
  AMLS  ,5/21/2007,1,20
  IEX   ,5/22/2007,3,2
  KSW   ,5/22/2007,1.049999952,1
  SAMBD ,5/23/2007,1,2.5
  WAIN  ,5/23/2007,1.049999952,1
  VCBC  ,5/24/2007,1.049999952,1
  IDUL E,5/24/2007,1,1000
  APPA  ,5/25/2007,1,4
  PCBK  ,5/29/2007,1.100000024,1
  FPBI  ,5/29/2007,1.049999952,1
  ATLS  ,5/29/2007,1.5,1
  GIL   ,5/29/2007,2,1
  FLPB  ,5/30/2007,1.049999952,1
  PPFS  ,5/30/2007,1.039999962,1
  POT   ,5/30/2007,3,1
  SOCB  ,5/30/2007,1.100000024,1
  PRWT  ,5/30/2007,1.049999952,1
  FMX   ,5/31/2007,3,1
  VSEA  ,5/31/2007,3,2

  Gary


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Edward Pottasch 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:33 AM
    Subject: [quotes-plus] changes in the database



    hi,

    is there a list where QP3 shows what changes are made to the database? For 
instance splits?  Sometimes I get a difference in the return of a backtest 
which I can't explain. Today I downloaded the data on both computers so I can 
not locate where the difference occurs. Usually this is caused due to a split.

    Which changes were made yesterday? And where can I find a list of changes 
for future reference?

    thanks, Ed


   

Reply via email to