ok thanks,

on first glance it seems a bit hard to use this in the practice since how do 
you know which symbols will be removed next. There must be some automated way 
...

rgds, Ed



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lionel Issen 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 11:20 AM
  Subject: RE: [quotes-plus] changes in the database



  Open qp_meta.exe.  The last button is “edit translate table”.



  Hope this helps.



  Lionel



  From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Edward Pottasch
  Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 1:57 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [quotes-plus] changes in the database



  ok thanks I couldn't find it but I will check with Amibroker since I use QP 
data only through Amibroker. There is a database setting in Amibroker that will 
not retrieve symbols without data but even before this function was added I 
believe symbols just lost all historical data once they were delisted from 
their exchange,



  rgds, Ed







    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Lionel Issen 

    To: [email protected] 

    Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 4:14 AM

    Subject: RE: [quotes-plus] changes in the database



    QP has a feature, I think its called a dictionary, that enables your to 
continue using your old symbols which QP recognizes as equivalent to the new 
signals.

    Lionel

    From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Edward Pottasch
    Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 4:42 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [quotes-plus] changes in the database

    hi,

    splits are one reason why my backtest looks a little different from one day 
to the other simply because a signal is not generated after a split or the 
other way around. Another more important reason for backtests to suddenly 
change is the fact that symbols are removed from 1 day to the other. Friday's 
backtest still used HCA en CMVT while the backtest for monday will not use them 
since the symbols are no longer there ...

    I understand that symbols that are no longer valid are removed but for 
backtesting it is horrible ... for proper portfolio backtesting one would need 
symbols to remain in the database for some period of time in my opinion.

    regards, Ed

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: gary 

      To: [email protected] 

      Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:55 PM

      Subject: Re: [quotes-plus] changes in the database

      There is no list you can look at.

      There can be a lot of changes on any day, yesterday, a lot of dead 
symbols were deleted.

      Here are the recent splits:

      SYMBOL,DATE,NEWQUAN,OLDQUAN
      VIVO  ,5/14/2007,3,2
      GENRD ,5/15/2007,1,6
      AOGS  ,5/15/2007,1,20
      AAA   ,5/15/2007,69.75,25.12999916
      INSP  ,5/16/2007,24.59000015,18.29000092
      MZ    ,5/16/2007,1,10
      NXY   ,5/16/2007,2,1
      FCEN  ,5/16/2007,1.5,1
      EWNR  ,5/16/2007,10,1
      TPC   ,5/16/2007,1,10
      CECB  ,5/17/2007,2,1
      RDDI  ,5/17/2007,2,1
      IBOC  ,5/17/2007,1.100000024,1
      CZNB  ,5/18/2007,1.049999952,1
      IBOC  ,5/19/2007,1.100000024,1
      AMLS  ,5/21/2007,1,20
      IEX   ,5/22/2007,3,2
      KSW   ,5/22/2007,1.049999952,1
      SAMBD ,5/23/2007,1,2.5
      WAIN  ,5/23/2007,1.049999952,1
      VCBC  ,5/24/2007,1.049999952,1
      IDUL E,5/24/2007,1,1000
      APPA  ,5/25/2007,1,4
      PCBK  ,5/29/2007,1.100000024,1
      FPBI  ,5/29/2007,1.049999952,1
      ATLS  ,5/29/2007,1.5,1
      GIL   ,5/29/2007,2,1
      FLPB  ,5/30/2007,1.049999952,1
      PPFS  ,5/30/2007,1.039999962,1
      POT   ,5/30/2007,3,1
      SOCB  ,5/30/2007,1.100000024,1
      PRWT  ,5/30/2007,1.049999952,1
      FMX   ,5/31/2007,3,1
      VSEA  ,5/31/2007,3,2

      Gary

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Edward Pottasch 

        To: [email protected] 

        Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:33 AM

        Subject: [quotes-plus] changes in the database

        hi,

        is there a list where QP3 shows what changes are made to the database? 
For instance splits?  Sometimes I get a difference in the return of a backtest 
which I can't explain. Today I downloaded the data on both computers so I can 
not locate where the difference occurs. Usually this is caused due to a split.

        Which changes were made yesterday? And where can I find a list of 
changes for future reference?

        thanks, Ed

    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/819 - Release Date: 5/26/2007 
10:47 AM



    No virus found in this outgoing message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/819 - Release Date: 5/26/2007 
10:47 AM




  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/819 - Release Date: 5/26/2007 
10:47 AM



  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/819 - Release Date: 5/26/2007 
10:47 AM




   

Reply via email to