Hi Earl - I re read this, I apologize if it sounds harsh. I didn't intend any direspect.
Best regards Gary Lyben ----- Original Message ----- From: garylyb To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:35 PM Subject: [quotes-plus] Re: NYSE: bad volume and A/D volume Hi The NYSE volume number of 1.3 billion that was sent out by qp is wrong. The WSJ reports only the volume for NYSE stocks that actually traded on the NYSE, that number is 2.2 billion. We don't have numbers comparable to the WSJ. Our numbers include all the volume for NYSE stocks that trade on any of the many different exchanges that trade NYSE stocks, that number is listed on the from page of www.nyse.com, it's over 5 billion, or twice the WSJ number. They are 2 different numbers, they are not comparable. Our NYSE numbers will never ever match the WSJ numbers. The volume number on the front page of www.nyse.com will never match the WSJ number, it's not wrong, they are 2 different numbers. Does the NYSE or the WSJ publish the correct NYSE numbers? Once I get them corrected, they will match the NYSE. I'll get it corrected as soon as I can. Best regards Gary Lyben --- In [email protected], "EAdamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If QP is showing 1.3M and WSJ is showing 2.2 million, QP can not be picking > up volume not picked up by the WSJ. An even bigger problem is the A/D volume > being so far off. WSJ is showing 10:1 down volume and QP is showing 7:5 down > volume. WSJ is on the money. I went back and looked through the previous > days and the numbers look questionable. > > Earl > > _____ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:quotes- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of garylyb > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [quotes-plus] Re: NYSE: bad volume and A/D volume > > > > > Hi Earl - > > The WSJ volume appears to be the NYSE only volume. We have the NYSE > volume > that includes all trades on and off of the NYSE, on Nasdaq, Arca etc. > > The WSJ numbers are not compatible with our historical numbers. I > have yet > another source for these numbers which appear close to the NYSE > listed > volume on their front page - http://www.nyse. <http://www.nyse.com/> com/ > > Here's the data from a differrent source whiich include NYSE listed > volume > on all exchanges > > - <exchdata> > - <nyse highs="13" lows="370"> > <issues advance="457" decline="2724" unchanged="70" /> > <shares advance="525152500" decline="5008652100" > unchanged="21180700" /> > </nyse> > - <nasdaq highs="33" lows="245"> > <issues advance="700" decline="2326" unchanged="118" /> > <shares advance="582313300" decline="2256543800" > unchanged="25718400" /> > </nasdaq> > - <amex highs="18" lows="317"> > <issues advance="339" decline="1187" unchanged="122" /> > <shares advance="164648800" decline="1372356600" > unchanged="17752400" /> > </amex> > - <otcbb highs="7" lows="50"> > <issues advance="521" decline="822" unchanged="432" /> > <shares advance="158627600" decline="218555000" > unchanged="65001900" /> > </otcbb> > </exchdata> > > I'll switch to this source asap. > > Best regards > > Gary Lyben > > --- In quotes-plus@ <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, > "EAdamy" <eadamy@> wrote: > > > > WSJ is showing for NYSE: > > Vol 2,164,391,810 > > AV 205,227,170 > > DV 1,948,769,320 > > > > QP showing 1.3 million shares and nearly equal A/D volume > > > > Earl > > >
