Hey, * Ibon Santisteban <[email protected]> [2016-02-29 22:18:30 +0100]: > First of all, I just discovered qutebrowser, and congratulations > (and thanks) for such a good piece of software.
You're welcome! > I'm not really sure this is an issue, but I thought I rather say > something than not: I have the feeling that for a minimalistic > browser, it uses too much RAM. I just compared to other browsers and > this is what I got, having the same amount of tabs (five) open with > the exact same websites: > > midori: 154.8 MiB > otter browser: 286.6 MiB > qupzilla: 198.0 MiB > luakit: 375.7 MiB (even though it started at around 278, it increases as time > goes by for some reason) > QUTEBROWSER: 587.9 MiB Hmm, interesting qutebrowser would use this much more RAM compared to Otter and QupZilla. What pages did you have open, and how precisely did you measure? (also note you're not subscribed to the list - I approved your posting by hand) Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | [email protected] (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
