Ludovico,

I've reviewed your patches  and i wonder why did you changed coredumper 
to static mode build?


Thanks
Vadim

Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am working on the Debian/Ubuntu package for QuteCom. I am trying to
> make a releasable-for-testing version of tag RC2.
> The package is nearly ready and, if you are interested, you can find the
> the debian-specific scripts in http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/qutecom
>
> I had to apply some patches that might be interesting for upstream
> inclusion:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/qutecom/trunk/debian/patches/generic/
>
> cmake-static-coredumper.patch
> -- link coredumper statically instead of as a shared library
>
> getcurrentdatetime.patch
> -- fix missing include that make the function to get the build date fail
>
> googlebreakpad-64bit.patch
> -- make ENABLE_CRASHREPORT enable/disable googlebreakpad, and disable on
> all architectures except x86
>
> install-qutecom.patch
> -- install in PREFIX/share/qutecom instead of PREFIX/share/wengophone
>
> cmake-repo-revision-uotes.patch
> -- fix missing quotes in cmake script to handle the the case of building
> without having mercurial information available
>
> desktop-file-update.patch
> -- fix executable name and improve comments
>
> Please let me think what do you think about them.
>
> Unfortunately I am still experiencing two issues that make it still
> unsuitable for upload:
> -crash when using video
> -crash when adding an IM account on 64 bit
>
> I am sending a proper bug report about those two issues in the next two
> posts to this ML.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludovico
> _______________________________________________
> QuteCom-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
QuteCom-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev

Reply via email to