Hi Ludovico, Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Right now the latest stable release is 2.2, which is the one being > distributed with Debian and Ubuntu (and will be included in natty), > without all the following commits.
In your experience, is the tip of the 2.2/2.3 branch at least as stable as the 2.2 release? No regressions worth speaking of? If so, then let's do a point release to 2.2 (2.2.1 is better than 2.3 I think). > IMHO it would make sense to include all these commits into a last 2.3 > (or maybe 2.2.1) release, so packagers can distribute them easily from > now until qutecom 3.0 stable release. Given that you've been doing packaging, and you know what bits you need & what bits you take in as external dependencies, how would you feel about helping prepare the release? Ideally we "just" need to generate a .tar.gz from Mercurial for the Linux release, and ensure that we get Windows & Mac binaries built from the same sources. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary dne...@free.fr Tel: +33 9 51 13 46 45 Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13 _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list QuteCom-dev@lists.qutecom.org http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
