On 04/21/2011 10:15 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > Ludovico Cavedon wrote: >> Right now the latest stable release is 2.2, which is the one being >> distributed with Debian and Ubuntu (and will be included in natty), >> without all the following commits. > > In your experience, is the tip of the 2.2/2.3 branch at least as stable > as the 2.2 release? No regressions worth speaking of?
Uhm, I am not able to answer this question. I actually never tried the latest qutecom-2.2 tip... > If so, then let's do a point release to 2.2 (2.2.1 is better than 2.3 I > think). I agreed 2.2.1 is better >> IMHO it would make sense to include all these commits into a last 2.3 >> (or maybe 2.2.1) release, so packagers can distribute them easily from >> now until qutecom 3.0 stable release. > > Given that you've been doing packaging, and you know what bits you need > & what bits you take in as external dependencies, how would you feel > about helping prepare the release? Ideally we "just" need to generate a > .tar.gz from Mercurial for the Linux release, and ensure that we get > Windows & Mac binaries built from the same sources. Yes, I would be happy to help, thanks for asking. What have you been using so far for generating the tarball? Thanks, Ludovico _______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list QuteCom-dev@lists.qutecom.org http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
