Hi, yeh sure do and I sincerely hope that no writer of a sequencer program
ever employs such logic.
It might take more time when editing but I for one want control over such
things.
Cheers!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Onj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "QWS list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: QWS List creativelabs--was Varying the pitch or strength
of a note
On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:04 PM,
Raymond Grote happened to mention in passing:
You know, that's an interesting point. If the midi standard had drum
kits be regular patches just like everything else, then they could
theoretically be on any track. Since most synths only support drums on
track 10 anyway and mangle them up when they are on other ones. Good to
point that out, though. The only reason I pointed that out is because
keyboards wont' transpose drum tracks, I thought qws could do it the
same way.
Aah but you see a keyboard will know what it's own banks and drum tracks
are if it has a sequencer in it, so it's alright for that. QWS is well,
it sounds horrible but is true, just a midi pass through box. Of course
it's much mor than that, but without employing fuzzy logic to determin how
a user is playing on a track, IE, regularly spaced intervals or a c down
there, an f sharp up here, and a c sharp higher than that, which for
example might be a bass drum, a highhat and a symbol and from that working
out that this is a drum track, would be crazy and mad, and not good.
Also, if you're then writing some kind of Jonny Cage minimalist music,
that wouldn't get transposed, anyway.
Kind of a funny point though. You'd get mad then because you couldn't
transpose not a drum track if you get my meaning.
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
