Hi

Yup, that covers it. It pretty well rules out (except at 3 MHz) other weird 
issues causing the problem.

Bob

> On Apr 14, 2024, at 10:28 AM, Jordan Arndt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob...
> 
> Yes, I have an Ailtech 460 sig-gen, and yes, none of the bands are totally 
> dead.
> 
> To check the sensitivity, I use the sig-gen at 50uV and again at 1uV, in AM 
> mode with 400hz modulated at 30%. I also use the Carrier Level meter and/or 
> the Line Level meter accordingly.
> I also check to see if I can peak the internal tube noise by adjusting the 
> Ant Trim and checking for a peak in the noise as indicated on the Line Level 
> meter with the receiver input terminated in a 50 ohm load.
> 
> Wth a 50uV input signal, the Carrier Meter shows a drop off below 8Mhz of ~ 4 
> to 6dB per band, with the 3 Mhz band being the outlier showing a ~ 12dB drop 
> which I believe is due to a weak crystal which produces only 2.4Vdc at E-402. 
> The rest of the lower band crystals all meet the -4 to -11Vdc spec as 
> measured at E-402.
> 
> Aside from a minor tracking problem in one of the 1st variable IF 
> transformers, the rest of the RF xfrmrs appear to be working normally and 
> track properly. I do note some scratching when the Ant Trim is rotated 
> quickly, but that only appears with no antenna connected. The Ant Trim peaks 
> normally on all bands.
> 
> I hope this answers some of your questions...
> 
> 73...Jordan VE6ZT
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Camp" <[email protected]>
> To: "Jordan Arndt" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Collins R-390 HF Receiver List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2024 12:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Tracking down low sensitivity 0 to 8 mhz problem
> 
> 
> 
> HI
> 
> This seems to be running on for a while.
> 
> Backing up a bit:
> 
> How do you know the sensitivity is low at < 8 MHz?
> 
> I’ve been assuming that you have a signal generator and have checked each of 
> the bands. I’ve also assumed we’re talking about “a bit deaf, but not dead”. 
> If any of that is not correct, then shame on me :).
> 
> If this is the case, just how low are you seeing relative to (say) 9 MHz? 
> (are we chasing 6 db or 26 db?)
> 
> Is it just as dead at (say) 600 KHz as at 1.5, 2.5 and 5 MHz? (is one of the 
> front end sections getting into the act as well?)
> 
> The point being, some of us (ok, maybe just me ….:) )  may be making 
> assumptions that aren’t correct. If we are, our advice isn’t going to be 
> quite as helpful as it could be.
> 
> Bob

______________________________________________________________
R-390 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to