[Moved to R-devel to ask a policy question.] On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 3/16/2007 8:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi all: >> >> I'm using 'persp' for 3D graphics. >> >> I need the axis's labels smaller than by defect. >> >> I see in 'help()', the information about 'par()'. >> >> I have wrote: >> >>> par(.....,cex.axis=0.5,cex.lab=0.5) >> perspc(.................) >> >> and the result don't change. >> >> The question is: Can I change the size of labels in the perps graph?? >> >> Thank you in advance: >> >> /salva >> >> 'cex.axis' The magnification to be used for axis annotation >> relative to the current setting of 'cex'. (Some functions >> such as 'points' accept a vector of values which are >> recycled. Other uses will take just the first value if a >> vector of length greater than one is supplied.) >> >> 'cex.lab' The magnification to be used for x and y labels relative >> to the current setting of 'cex'. > > Those don't appear to be supported by persp, but cex is: e.g. > > x <- 1:10 > y <- 1:10 > z <- outer(x,y,function(x,y) sin((x+y)/10)) > persp(x,y,z, cex=0.5) I've added this to ?persp and ?par, but I wondered if people thought we should change this to be like 2D plots. Especially Ross I., who I believe is the author here? Brian -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
