Hi
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Paul Murrell wrote: > >> Hi >> >> >> Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >>> [Moved to R-devel to ask a policy question.] >>> >>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/16/2007 8:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>> Hi all: >>>>> >>>>> I'm using 'persp' for 3D graphics. >>>>> >>>>> I need the axis's labels smaller than by defect. >>>>> >>>>> I see in 'help()', the information about 'par()'. >>>>> >>>>> I have wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> par(.....,cex.axis=0.5,cex.lab=0.5) >>>>> perspc(.................) >>>>> >>>>> and the result don't change. >>>>> >>>>> The question is: Can I change the size of labels in the perps graph?? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you in advance: >>>>> >>>>> /salva >>>>> >>>>> 'cex.axis' The magnification to be used for axis annotation >>>>> relative to the current setting of 'cex'. (Some functions >>>>> such as 'points' accept a vector of values which are >>>>> recycled. Other uses will take just the first value if a >>>>> vector of length greater than one is supplied.) >>>>> >>>>> 'cex.lab' The magnification to be used for x and y labels relative >>>>> to the current setting of 'cex'. >>>> Those don't appear to be supported by persp, but cex is: e.g. >>>> >>>> x <- 1:10 >>>> y <- 1:10 >>>> z <- outer(x,y,function(x,y) sin((x+y)/10)) >>>> persp(x,y,z, cex=0.5) >>> I've added this to ?persp and ?par, but I wondered if people thought we >>> should change this to be like 2D plots. Especially Ross I., who I believe >>> is the author here? >> >> I think Ross wrote the original. I've hacked some of it a couple of >> times. I have no problem with allowing par()s to work with persp(), >> though not everything makes sense (e.g., par("mar"), or par("mgp") where >> it gets tricky to get units right or units just do not make sense). >> There are also 2D-specific ones, like par("xaxt"), though in those cases >> one option might be to just offer an inline z-analogue in the arguments >> to persp() (?) > > I was not proposing anything so radical, just that 'cex' (and perhaps > 'font') should perhaps work in the same way as 2D plots. Yep, sounds cool. Paul -- Dr Paul Murrell Department of Statistics The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019 Auckland New Zealand 64 9 3737599 x85392 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~paul/ ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel