On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Duncan Murdoch<murd...@stats.uwo.ca> wrote:
> On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
...
>> I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently written
>> is at best ambiguous and confusing, and would benefit from improved
>> wording.
>
> A claim that documentation would benefit from improved wording is a
> tautology. A claim that the documentation is ambiguous requires more
> evidence than you've offered. You have demonstrated that someone could be
> confused when reading it, but that isn't necessarily our responsibility.
Of course not. I forgot. This is r-devel: the user is always wrong,
the developer is always right.
-s
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
