On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Duncan Murdoch<murd...@stats.uwo.ca> wrote: > On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote: ... >> I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently written >> is at best ambiguous and confusing, and would benefit from improved >> wording. > > A claim that documentation would benefit from improved wording is a > tautology. A claim that the documentation is ambiguous requires more > evidence than you've offered. You have demonstrated that someone could be > confused when reading it, but that isn't necessarily our responsibility.
Of course not. I forgot. This is r-devel: the user is always wrong, the developer is always right. -s ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel