On 03/09/2009 5:36 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Duncan Murdoch<murd...@stats.uwo.ca> wrote:
On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
...
I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently written
is at best ambiguous and confusing, and would benefit from improved
wording.
A claim that documentation would benefit from improved wording is a
tautology. A claim that the documentation is ambiguous requires more
evidence than you've offered. You have demonstrated that someone could be
confused when reading it, but that isn't necessarily our responsibility.
Of course not. I forgot. This is r-devel: the user is always wrong,
the developer is always right.
Yes, you want r-whinge. That's down the hall.
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
