On 13/09/2010 2:38 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 09/13/2010 03:34 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>  Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>  Hi Duncan,
>>
>>  On 09/12/2010 05:07 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>  On 12/09/2010 12:49 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>>>  Hi Duncan,
>>>>
>>>>  On 09/11/2010 03:56 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>>  On 11/09/2010 12:52 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I found the following problem with recent R-devel
>>>>>>  (2010-08-26 r52817) on Windows (32-bit and 64-bit):
>>>>>>  'R CMD build<pkg>' gets stalled during vignett
>>>>>>  creation for packages that have a Makefile in<pkg>/inst/doc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  It seems that the problem is that the commands used in the
>>>>>>  Makefile for converting .tex to .pdf are not able to locate
>>>>>>  the Sweave.sty file anymore (if I drop this file to
>>>>>>  <pkg>/inst/doc, then the problem goes away).
>>>>>  This sounds like a problem that only the package maintainer could
>>>>>  address. Presumably it will be temporary: once they adjust to the new
>>>>>  organization of the share/texmf directory, things will be fine again.
>>>>>
>>>>>  The reorg is described in this NEWS item:
>>>>>
>>>>>  * Directory R_HOME/share/texmf now follows the TDS conventions, so
>>>>>  can be set as a texmf tree ('root directory' in MiKTeX parlance).
>>>>  Before this reorg, the package maintainer didn't have to care about
>>>>  where to find things in R_HOME/share/texmf. 'R CMD build' would just
>>>>  find them by setting the TEXINPUTS envir variable appropriately (and
>>>>  then commands in the inst/doc/Makefile file would find them too).
>>>>
>>>>  This reorg was checked in svn as rev 52256. I see the following
>>>>  adjustments to TEXINPUTS:
>>>>
>>>>  ** On Unix (src/scripts/Rcmd.in file):
>>>>
>>>>  -## Append 'share/texmf' to TeX's input search path.
>>>>  -if test -z "$TEXINPUTS}"; then
>>>>  - TEXINPUTS=".:${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf:"
>>>>  +## Append 'share/texmf/...' to TeX's input search path.
>>>>  +if test -z "${TEXINPUTS}"; then
>>>>  + TEXINPUTS=".:${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf/tex/latex:"
>>>>  else
>>>>  - TEXINPUTS=".:${TEXINPUTS}:${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf:"
>>>>  + TEXINPUTS=".:${TEXINPUTS}:${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf/tex/latex:"
>>>>  fi
>>>>  export TEXINPUTS
>>>>
>>>>  ** On Windows (src/gnuwin32/fixed/etc/Rcmd_environ file):
>>>>
>>>>  -TEXINPUTS=.;${TEXINPUTS};${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf;
>>>>  +TEXINPUTS=.;${TEXINPUTS};${R_SHARE_DIR}/texmf/tex/latex;
>>>>
>>>>  The path seems to have been adjusted correctly. So my question is:
>>>>  why isn't this working on Windows for packages that use a Makefile?
>>>  I don't know. My first assumption would that something in the Makefile
>>>  is wrong, but since you don't give any examples, I can't check.
>>
>>  There are 8 Bioconductor packages failing to build on Windows
>>  because of this problem. They have a Makefile in inst/doc/ that
>>  calls 'pdflatex' or 'texi2dvi --pdf' on<some_vignette>  to convert
>>  <some_vignette>.tex into<some_vignette>.pdf. They don't
>>  have Sweave.sty in inst/doc/ (other packages use the same kind of
>>  Makefile and are building ok because they have a copy of Sweave.sty
>>  in inst/doc/).
>>
>>  For example, here is the content of adSplit/inst/doc/Makefile:
>>
>>  all: pdf clean
>>
>>  pdf: tr_2005_02.tex
>>  epstopdf splitSet.eps
>>  pdflatex tr_2005_02
>>  pdflatex tr_2005_02
>>  pdflatex tr_2005_02
>>
>>  clean:
>>  rm -f *.aux *.eps *.log *.out *.tex *.toc
>>  rm -f Rplots.ps splitSet.pdf tr_2005_02-*
>>
>>  The 7 other packages use similar Makefile. As I said before, they
>>  all used to build ok before the R_HOME/share/texmf reorg. They still
>>  build ok on non-Windows machines. Thanks!
>>
>>  H.
>
>  On Windows using MikTeX, we put a -I option on the command line to point
>  to the input directory. If you don't want to do that, you can use "R CMD
>  texify --pdf" instead of "pdflatex"; it will try to determine the
>  appropriate command line based on the platform.

Yes I can use 'R CMD some_command' instead of just 'some_command' in the
Makefile so 'some_command' sees the TEXINPUTS variable and that solves
the problem. But when I call 'R CMD build', shouldn't 'make' and its
child processes ('pdflatex', 'texify', etc...) already see TEXINPUTS?
Why do I need to call the commands in the Makefile thru R CMD again
in order to see TEXINPUTS?

Thanks for suggesting workarounds but don't you think there is a real
problem?


As I said, we don't use TEXINPUTS on Windows, we use the command line version. I didn't write the code, so I don't know why there's the difference, but I assume there's a reason for it, and presumably the reason is that relying on TEXINPUTS doesn't work.

Duncan Murdoch

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to