--- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > On 9 December 2012 at 18:17, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > | Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, > tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" unintentionally. > | > | This seems to come from a change in tests/Makefile.in, > which adds the line: > | -@rm -f *.tar.gz *.Rd back in May 2012. > | > | ----------- > | commit c4d70254e7b7f9d7ed17faecfb3097195d852ddc > | Author: ripley > <ripley@00db46b3-68df-0310-9c12-caf00c1e9a41> > | Date: Sun May 27 09:04:41 2012 +0000 > | > | fix some issues seen by examining > no-segfaults.Rout > | > | git-svn-id: https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk@59451 > 00db46b3-68df-0310-9c12-caf00c1e9a41 > | ---------- > | > | svn users probably don't notice files are unintentionally > removed; git-svn does complain about version-controlled > files being missing during rebase (i.e. re-applying local > private patches to an updated upstream). > > svn marks missing files via a '!' (and unknown/unexpected > files with a '?'): > > edd@max:~/svn/r-devel/tests$ svn st > ? Makefile > ! ver20.Rd > ? Native/Makefile > ? > Examples/utils-Ex.Rout.fail > ? Examples/Makefile > ! testit.Rd > ? Embedding/Makefile > edd@max:~/svn/r-devel/tests$ > > Do you REALLY think svn would not know about missing > files? There does not > seem to be a limit on the disdain for svn among git users. > Fascinating. > > Dirk
Sorry about the over-sight on subversion - to be honest I have not been using subversion itself at all, since I am happier with git-svn (entirely my own opinion). That said, please do not distract the issue - a small bug was introduced back in May which you seem to corroborate. Thanks for confirming the issue being also seen with subversion, nonetheless. I know a few number of people who are happier with bzr, darcs, mercurial. That doesn't really say much about anything. Hin-Tak ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
