Can you (Frederick, Peter, Keith, but ideally others, too)
confirm that you don't see any problems anymore, when building a
version of R-devel from sources that are newer
than (or equal to) svn revision 70632 (2016-05-19 10:59:51, see below)?
I'm asking because the question is open if these should be
"back ported" to R 3.3.0 patched or not.
Best regards,
Martin
>>>>> Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Thu, 19 May 2016 11:02:48 +0200 writes:
>>>>> <frede...@ofb.net>
>>>>> on Wed, 18 May 2016 15:03:31 -0700 writes:
>>> Readline <= 6.2 shouldn't require the SIGWINCH patch, so
>>> if older versions have trouble finding rl_resize_terminal
>>> then you could wrap a macro around that part.
>> I find python related patches that use
>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL
>> so they must have configured for that. We could and
>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy
>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd
>> appreciate others to produce code for that.
> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!)
> enough, so I've now committed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r70632 | maechler | 2016-05-19 10:59:51 +0200 (Thu, 19 May 2016) | 1 line
> Changed paths:
> M configure
> M configure.ac
> M src/include/config.h.in
> M src/unix/sys-std.c
> check for rl_resize_terminal() now
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ... and Keith should even not see the warning anymore
> (nor Peter the error, when compiling using readline 5.x instead of
6.[23]).
[...........]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
