There are many issues with different gcc versions, but they can at least be
minimized by using static linking, i.e. you should at the very least use
-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc to make sure you don't mix runtime versions.
We run into the same problem since C++11 compilers are rare on production
machines, but as long as you can isolate the packages away from the dynamically
loaded code it often works since R only works at symbol level as long as you
have a self-contained binary. The only other thing to worry about are ABI
changes, but unless you use Fortran they tend to be compatible enough.
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Paul Johnson <pauljoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a cluster that is based on RedHat 6.2, we are updating to R-3.3.1.
> I have, from time to time, run into problems with various R packages
> and some older versions of GCC. I wish we had newer Linux in the
> cluster, but with 1000s of nodes running 1000s of jobs, well, they
> don't want a restart.
> Administrator suggested I try to build with the GCC that is provided
> with the nodes, which is gcc-4.4.7. To my surprise, R-3.3.1 compiled
> with that. After that, I got quite far, many 100s of packages
> compiled, but then I hit a snag that RccArmadillo explicitly refuses
> to build with anything older than gcc-4.6. The OpenMx package and
> emplik packages also refuse to compile with old gcc
> The cluster uses a module system, it is easy enough to swap in various
> gcc versions to see what compiles.
> I did succeed compiling RcppArmadillo with gcc 4.9.2. But Rcpp is not
> picky, it compiled with gcc-4.4.7.
> I worry...
> 1) will reliance on various GCC make the packages incompatible with
> R, or each other?
> I logged out, logged back in, with R 3.3.1 I can run
> with no errors so far. But I'm not stress testing it much.
> I should rebuild everything?
> I expect that if I were to use gcc-6 on one package, it would not be
> compatible with binaries built with 4.4.7. But is there a zone of
> tolerance allowing 4.4.7 and 4.9 packages to coexist?
> 2) If I build with non-default GCC, are all of the R users going to
> hit trouble if they don't have the same GCC I use? Unless I make some
> extraordinary effort, they are getting GCC 4.4.7. If they try to
> install a package, they are getting that GCC, not the one I use to
> build RcppArmadillo or the other trouble cases (or everything, if you
> say I need to go back and rebuild).
>> From an administrative point of view, should I tie R-3.3.1 to a
> particular version of GCC? I think I could learn how to do that.
> On the cluster, they use the module framework. There are about 50
> versions of GCC. It is easy enough ask for a newer one:
> $ module load gcc/4.9.2
> It puts the gcc 4.9.2 binaries and shared libraries at the front of the PATHs.
> Paul E. Johnson http://pj.freefaculty.org
> Director, Center for Research Methods and Data Analysis http://crmda.ku.edu
> To write me directly, address me at pauljohn at ku.edu.
> Remail@example.com mailing list
Rfirstname.lastname@example.org mailing list