> Roger Koenker wrote:
> > My understanding is that if I now try to construct a matrix.diag.csr
> > object checking of it should be like the checking for a matrix.csr object
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, John Chambers wrote:
> Well, hopefully. But there seems a slight problem in the validity
> method.
>
> You require a dimension slot of length 2, but the default object
> generated from matrix.csr fails that:
John's comment revealed a couple of problems with my default matrix.csr
object, which -- once corrected -- allowed the validity checking for
the new class to operate just as I had originally expected. The moral
of the story is that checking the validity of the default object with
new("classname")
is quite worthwhile...thanks again to John,
Roger
url: www.econ.uiuc.edu/~roger/my.html Roger Koenker
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Economics
vox: 217-333-4558 University of Illinois
fax: 217-244-6678 Champaign, IL 61820
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
