On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We'd probably want to take a closer look at what the issue really
> > is,
>
> yes, definitely
Yep.
> My system has:
>
> galadriel:Leisch$ dpkg -l tetex*
> ii tetex-base 2.0.2-4.1 basic teTeX library files
> ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-4.2 teTeX binary files
> ii tetex-doc 2.0.2-4.1 teTeX documentation
> ii tetex-extra 2.0.2-4.1 extra teTeX library files
Sure, that was public knowledge as we know you run testing. What we need is
some 'meta diff' over tetex, just like Peter suggested.
Tony: Is there a changelog entry somewhere in tetex which reveals anything?
Dirk
--
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
-- Groucho Marx
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
