Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1 > is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2 > related fixes. Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary > decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R > 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support.
I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's not much point in messing with it now. -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
