On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 10:35, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1 > > is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2 > > related fixes. Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary > > decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R > > 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support. > > I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz > and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too > much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official > one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's > not much point in messing with it now.
True on all accounts. Marc ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
