Besides beauty, is there an actual advantage in terms of run-time and/or memory use?
Ralf On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Bert Gunter <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not that it's "bad" -- it's just unnecessarily clumsy. ALmost > always, tapply/by will do the same thing more simply. > > -- Bert > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Ralf B <[email protected]> wrote: >>> In general, the lapply(split(...)) construction should never be used. >> >> Why? What makes it so bad to use? >> > ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
