Ralf B wrote:
> Besides beauty, is there an actual advantage in terms of run-time
> and/or memory use?
If you look at the actual definition of tapply, I'm sure you realize
that the answer is no:
ans <- lapply(split(X, group), FUN, ...)
inbetween 40-odd lines of "red tape" is something of a giveaway...
--
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: [email protected] Priv: [email protected]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
