On 09/20/2010 08:01 PM, David Winsemius wrote: > index foo > 1.6 1 -3.0267759 > 1.7 1 -1.3725536 > 1.19 1 -1.1476048 > 1.16 1 -1.0963967 > 1.2 1 -1.0684793 > 2.29 2 -1.6601486 > 2.21 2 -1.2633632 > 2.22 2 -0.9875626 > 2.38 2 -0.9515301 > 2.30 2 -0.8638903 > > Unlike Dalgaard who arrived at a similar result via a different route > and called the row names "silly", I thought they were informative. But > maybe the sobriquet was directed at his second solution. I couldn't > tell. >
It's not a big deal, it's just that I know the hoops that the dataframe code jumps through in order to generate unique rownames, which hardly anyone ever uses. -- Peter Dalgaard Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.