I never realised that nonsense results don’n bother experienced users…..
Probably I am not experienced wiith my 6years of R professional work.
I think your advise is incomplete: a %>% dplyr::group_by(groep) %>%
dplyr::summarise(m=mean(v),n=dplyr::n())
Gives the same problems and makes the line ugly. Or how would you do this?
I stick with my advise: use dplyr. if you do not need plyr: stay away from it.
If you need it: do not attach it, but use the plyr:: notation.
I agree that plyr is something else as dplyr, and unfortunately plyr will be
used for some time.
Verzonden vanuit Mail voor Windows 10
Van: Jeff Newmiller
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
