On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:49 AM, hadley wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> More seriously : I don't think relative numbers of package downloads can >> be interpreted in any reasonable way, because reasons for package >> download have a very wide range from curiosity ("what's this ?"), fun >> (think "fortunes"...), to vital need tthink lme4 if/when a consensus on >> denominator DFs can be reached :-)...). What can you infer in good faith >> from such a mess ? > > So when we have messy data with measurement error, we should just give > up? Doesn't sound very statistical! ;) >
Also I would think that the rankings would be meaningful since the factors that cause the absolute numbers to be off would affect all packages equally. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.