On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 09:38 PM, JRG wrote:
On 11 Jul 03, at 21:20, John Christie wrote:
In what sense are the SSs "incorrect", exactly? And what do you think the "correct" values should be?
Well, if I take the residuals for one of the main effects I should be able to calculate a confidence interval from it that has some relationship to the actual values for that effect so that an accurate plot can be made. The transformation isn't too hard, I just need to divide them by the number of factors in the other term. But, my recollection is that this isn't true for other stats packages and may lead people who are new and trying to calculate them for the first time to incorrect conclusions. The reported values should be corrected. Although, my recollection could be wrong.
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
