People tend to get the quickest and most helpful responses when they provide a toy problem that produces what they think are anamolous results. This increases the chances that someone will be able to provide a sensible answer in the few seconds they have available for your question. Often, the process of preparing a toy problem leads them to an answer to their question.
Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. spencer graves
JRG wrote:
On 11 Jul 03, at 21:20, John Christie wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to work with error terms given back from aov to make confidence intervals. However, the numbers seem to be incorrect. If there is more than one term in the ANOVA then the error terms can be inflated by the number of factors in the extra terms. The F's are correct so it is right back to the SS. I was wondering if this is standard practice for stats programs or unique to R?
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
In what sense are the SSs "incorrect", exactly? And what do you think the "correct" values should be?
---JRG
John R. Gleason Associate Professor
Syracuse University 430 Huntington Hall Voice: 315-443-3107 Syracuse, NY 13244-2340 USA FAX: 315-443-4085
PGP public key at keyservers
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
