Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>In the long term, I'd like it if all of Rgui could be moved to a
>package. From most users' points of view things wouldn't change much,
>but it would mean it was more practical for someone like you to write
>your own front-end, either by modifying the standard one or by
>starting from scratch.
I totally agree. Recent developments in SciViews (which will be publicly
released in May) focus on GUI extentions *for* Rgui, not *in replacement* of
it as it was the case for SciViews Insider. I have difficulties with
specific aspects like buffered output, whose state is hard to know from R
code... This would be a lot more easier if all Rgui extensions could be
accessed through R code. A dedicated package is an excellent idea.
OK, that said, I go back to my work, because I still have a lot to finish
for UseR! conference...
Best regards,
Philippe Grosjean
.......................................................<?}))><....
) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( Prof. Philippe Grosjean
\ ___ )
\/ECO\ ( Numerical Ecology of Aquatic Systems
/\___/ ) Mons-Hainaut University, Pentagone
/ ___ /( 8, Av. du Champ de Mars, 7000 Mons, Belgium
/NUM\/ )
\___/\ ( phone: + 32.65.37.34.97, fax: + 32.65.37.33.12
\ ) email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) ) ) ) ) SciViews project coordinator (http://www.sciviews.org)
( ( ( ( (
...................................................................
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
