On 20 Aug 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > "Samuelson, Frank*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I encountered a similar problem with > > 1. Intel compilers. > > 2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox) > > Ooops. I didn't notice #2 the first time around. If we're failing the > checks with no optimization, then we surely have set the tolerances > too tight.
He may be, but I am not (i686, x86_64, Solaris 32- and 64-bit, Windows), all gcc 3.4.1 with -O2 and without (in most cases). -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
