Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 20 Aug 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > > "Samuelson, Frank*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I encountered a similar problem with > > > 1. Intel compilers. > > > 2. gcc when I turn off optimizations (no -Ox) > > > > Ooops. I didn't notice #2 the first time around. If we're failing the > > checks with no optimization, then we surely have set the tolerances > > too tight. > > He may be, but I am not (i686, x86_64, Solaris 32- and 64-bit, Windows), > all gcc 3.4.1 with -O2 and without (in most cases).
Yes, I couldn't reproduce it on x86_64 either. What was the exact platform again? -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
