"Kevin R. Coombes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Consider the following (much simplified) Sweave example: > > -------------- > > First, we set the value of $x$: > <<chunk1,eval=FALSE>>= > x <- 1 > @ > > Then we set the value of $y$: > <<chunk2,eval=FALSE>>= > y <- 2 > @ > > Thus, the overall algorithm has this structure: > <<combined,eval=FALSE>>= > <<chunk1>> > <<chunk2>> > @ > > <<justDoIt,echo=FALSE>>= > <<combined>> > @ > > --------------- > > I'd like to be able to do something like this, where the "combined" > chunk prints out in the final LaTeX document essentially verbatim. In > particular, I want to see the "<<chunk1>>" unexpanded in that block, > since this gives me a nice conceptual overview of the algorithm. (Of > courser, this is more useful when chunk1 and chunk2 are much longer than > they are in this example....) > > Is there an option that allows me to get this behavior?
Maybe I'm not understanding what it is you want, but why not: \begin{verbatim} <<chunk1>> <<chunk2>> \end{verbatim} What does putting this in an unevaluated chunk buy you? The <<chunkName>> markers are an internal detail of the document and so must of the time these never appear in the rendered output. Even in your example, won't it be confusing that <<chunk1>> and <<chunk2>> won't have appeared in labels earlier in the rendered document? + seth -- Seth Falcon | Computational Biology | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center http://bioconductor.org ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.