Hello,
I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
(which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
Thanks,
Adah
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
