Dear Adah, win-builder is fairly easy, but once you've setup a github repository using
https://github.com/metacran/r-builder you might save even that few amount of work. Best, Sven > On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On 26 January 2016 at 14:03, Adah Zhang wrote: > | I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results > | in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the > | CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples > | (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself). > | > | How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do > | not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the > | examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer > | goes through aside from 'R CMD check'? > > "Use a different computer." > > That is not as flippant as it sounds because > > -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp > submission away > > -- thanks to Carl and yours truly you can also try a variety of Docker > containers for R including r-devel prebuilt and even SAN/ASAN/UBSAN > flavours > > -- the remainer of campus should offer some choices too though that relies > on your local contacts. > > Sometimes these things are of course also due to something else but as you > supplied nothing concrete or reproducible I cannot be more specific either. > > Hope this helps. It's the right list for the question. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
