Ok, my fault sorry: This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear maintainer, package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the pre-test at: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/mdsOpt_0.3-1_20180404_090906/Windows/00check.log> Status: 1 NOTE Current CRAN status: ERROR: 1, OK: 11 See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_mdsOpt.html> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform. If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on the R-package-devel mailing list: <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all to this message and explain. More details are given in the directory: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/mdsOpt_0.3-1_20180404_090906/> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days. Best regards, CRAN teams' auto-check service ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And following the first link: * using log directory 'd:/RCompile/CRANincoming/R-devel/mdsOpt.Rcheck' * using R version 3.5.0 alpha (2018-03-30 r74499) * using platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32 (64-bit) * using session charset: ISO8859-1 * checking for file 'mdsOpt/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * this is package 'mdsOpt' version '0.3-1' * package encoding: UTF-8 * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: 'Andrzej Dudek <andrzej.du...@ue.wroc.pl>' Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: De (13:2) Diday (14:47) Groenen (12:13, 14:2) Leeuw (13:5) Mair (12:30, 13:16) Walesiak (15:2, 16:2) Winsberg (14:18) The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case: 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic Data' 'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-Valued Symbolic Data' * checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking serialization versions ... OK * checking whether package 'mdsOpt' can be installed ... OK * checking installed package size ... OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking top-level files ... OK * checking for left-over files ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ... OK * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * loading checks for arch 'i386' ** checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK ** checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK ** checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK ** checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK ** checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK ** checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK ** checking use of S3 registration ... OK * loading checks for arch 'x64' ** checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK ** checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK ** checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK ** checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK ** checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK ** checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK ** checking use of S3 registration ... OK * checking dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... [12s] OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd metadata ... OK * checking Rd line widths ... OK * checking Rd cross-references ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK * checking contents of 'data' directory ... OK * checking data for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK * checking examples ... ** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [15s] OK ** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [16s] OK * checking for unstated dependencies in 'tests' ... OK * checking tests ... ** running tests for arch 'i386' ... [4s] OK Running 'testthat.R' [4s] ** running tests for arch 'x64' ... [5s] OK Running 'testthat.R' [5s] * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * DONE Status: 1 NOTE So I assume the rejection is due to misspelling note (or maybe I cannot read this message properly :-)) Still appreciate any help Best regards Andrzej -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:48 PM To: Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> Cc: Dudek Andrzej <andrzej.du...@ue.wroc.pl>; r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot submit package due to misspell note On 05/04/2018 4:41 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > I think it was reasonable to post this to the list for discussion -- > it's good not to bother the CRAN maintainers unnecessarily. At this > point it might be more productive to e-mail them (CRAN maintainers) > for clarification: e.g., explain your interpretation of what they're > asking you to do and give them some options about how you might > propose to meet their requirements. Otherwise you're asking a bunch of > strangers on the internet to guess what the CRAN maintainers want you > to do ... > ... without showing us what they asked you to do. Duncan Murdoch > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 05/04/2018 4:17 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote: >>> >>> CRAN maintainers rejected the package two times already due to this >>> note >>> >>> But for previous version I've been asked to add the references in >>> description field: >>> >>>> Package Information: >>>> Package: mdsOpt >>>> Version: 0.1-4 >>>> Title: Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric Data >>>> Author(s): Marek Walesiak <marek.wales...@ue.wroc.pl> Andrzej Dudek >>>> <andrzej.du...@ue.wroc.pl> >>>> Maintainer: Andrzej Dudek <andrzej.du...@ue.wroc.pl> >>>> Depends: smacof, clusterSim >>>> Suggests: testthat >>>> Description: Searching for optimal multidimensional scaling procedure for >>>> metric data. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, can you please extend your description text. >>> >>> Can you provide some references in the form authors (year) <doi:...> >>> or <arXiv:...> (no space after 'doi:' and 'arXiv:')? >>> >>> Best, >>> Swetlana Herbrandt >>> >>> -------------------- >>> >>> So at this point is some kind of vicious circle for me :-) Maybe >>> adding quotation mark is best idea (?) >>> >> >> You didn't post the message for the current submission. In my >> experience, they won't reject a package due to false positives from >> the spell checker, so I would guess that you have misinterpreted their >> rejection message. >> >> When I was checking incoming packages, I would generally ask >> submitters to respect the requirement to use complete sentences; none >> of your "sentences", e.g. >> >> Selecting the optimal multidimensional scaling (MDS) procedure for >> metric data via metric MDS (ratio, interval, mspline) and nonmetric MDS >> (ordinal). >> >> and your reference list >> >> (Borg, I., Groenen, P.J.F., Mair, P. (2013) <doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31848-1>, >> De Leeuw, J., Mair, P. (2015) <doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat06268.pub2>, >> Groenen, P.J.F., Winsberg, S., Rodriguez, O., Diday, E. (2006) >> <doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.04.003>, Walesiak, M. (2016) >> <doi:10.15611/ekt.2016.2.01>, >> Walesiak, M. (2017) <doi:10.15611/ekt.2017.3.01>). >> >> are grammatically complete sentences, so I probably would have asked >> you to reword things. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
