Hi Michael! I'd like to make the smallest change possible to Bob Wheeler's original code so I'm not sure if using <stdbool.h> is the best route forward.
I do see that the definitions are the same there. Is there a low-cost way to use that header file or just those definitions? Thank you! -- Jerome On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 3:46 AM Michael Chirico <michaelchiri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you want to use <stdbool.h> instead of your macros? > > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stdbool.h.html > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 12:37 AM Jerome Braun <jvbraun.statist...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I'm currently the maintainer of AlgDesign, though my C skill is clearly a >> little too low for the task. >> >> It has become necessary for me to fix some issues with the code that had >> defined true, false, and bool in the header file (wheeler.h). >> >> Lines 23 and 24 currently have: >> >> #define true 1 >> #define false 0 >> >> There used to be a line 25 that had: >> >> #define bool int >> >> I removed line 25 and changed all occurrences in the C code of "bool" to >> "int". But this doesn't seem to have fully resolved the issue. >> >> The current checks on AlgDesign generate a warning based on header lines >> 23 >> and 24: >> >> Debian: < >> >> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/AlgDesign_1.2.1.2_20250331_023833/Debian/00check.log >> > >> Status: 1 WARNING, 1 NOTE >> >> I'm not sure what this means yet, nor how to resolve it properly. I would >> love some help in working forward, if possible. >> >> Thank you very much! >> -- >> Jerome >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
