Le 31/03/2025 à 18:00, Jerome Braun a écrit :
Hi Duncan!
Since the compiler will supply stdbool.h, it's safer to use that than to
try to emulate it.
Understood. It seems like the definitions are exactly the same between the
two.
Yes and no. Yes, true and false are the same. No, because there is also
__bool_true_false_are_defined which is set to 1 and this can make the
compiler react differently in various situations.
Currently there is no use of "bool" in any of the code (after having
changed bool to int everywhere in the code).
So I think I can replace the two lines in the original code with a call to
include the <stdbool.h> header --- does that seem reasonable? Can I use
an include statement there in place of those two lines?
I think it would be good and safe idea.
Best,
Serguei.
Thank you!
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
