HI Iñaki, 

That's interesting. 

I may be wrong but I think it's the Symbol font that's got the
substitution bug, not Helvetica. 

❯ fc-match "Symbol"
StandardSymbolsPS.t1: "Standard Symbols PS" "Regular"

Is what I get, but then in the Evince properties it's telling me that
it's substituting Symbol with "Noto Sans Regular", despite the Standard
Symbols PS font being installed. 


When I make a ~/.font.config file (I didn't have one already) with the
contents: 

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>

  <match target="pattern">
    <test name="family" qual="any" >
      <string>Symbol</string>
    </test>
    <edit name="family" mode="assign" binding="same">
      <string>OpenSymbol</string>
    </edit>
  </match>

</fontconfig>


(OpenSymbol is in libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts) 


Then evince shows me the symbols. (Whether they're the correct ones or
not, I don't know! They look right to me, but I'm a biologist, so...).
 

And now: 

❯ fc-match "Symbol"
opens___.ttf: "OpenSymbol" "Regular"


So, I think that's another option for you, Martin. But I think
embedding might still be the better choice, anyway. 

I now don't think the bug is with Evince. I suspect something's telling
Evince (and Okular) to use the wrong font, but you can force a more
appropriate substitution.


Do you think it could be this?: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665


Thanks, 
Peter

 



On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 18:59 +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Martin, I wouldn't rule out an R issue yet. Fonts are... tricky. So
> I'm cc'ing Paul Murrell here. 
> 
> I tried several viewers here and I see the following: Chrome, Firefox
> and Libreoffice Draw show the symbols; however, evince, okular and
> xournal++ agree on **not** showing the symbols. **If** there is a
> bug, the bug would be in fontconfig, because these ones AFAIK
> properly delegate on fontconfig, which is the system-wide component
> that decides what font substitution should be made for any given
> font. However, I see:
> 
> $ fc-match Helvetica
> NimbusSans-Regular.otf: "Nimbus Sans" "Regular"
> 
> which is the right choice. And okular confirms this by showing in a
> properties dialog that it is substituting Helvetica with URW's Nimbus
> Sans Regular. So why aren't the symbols displayed? My best guess is
> that this has something to do with how R encodes such symbols. Paul
> introduced some changes to fix similar issues for Cairo devices when
> Fedora dropped support for Type 1 fonts, see [1]. Now, I'm no font
> expert, but it seems to me that the pdf device may require similar
> fixes. (And why do xpdf or Firefox show the glyphs... I have no idea.
> I guess they do their thing without asking fontconfig).
> 
> [1] https://blog.r-project.org/2020/04/17/changes-to-symbol-fonts-
> for-cairo-graphics-devices/
> 
> Peter, as an aside, note that cairo_pdf embeds the fonts by default.
> 
> Best,
> Iñaki
> 
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 15:31, <pst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Martin and Tim, 
> > 
> > I also have this bug. Though I think not necessarily with all the
> > same
> > fonts as Martin. 
> > 
> > Using Martin's code:
> > 
> > https://imgur.com/a/ILUoe3H
> > 
> > Fedora 39, Evince 45.0
> > 
> > It's a bug with Evince. I think. I think it's substituting in a
> > font
> > set that doesn't have all the required symbols. I think it should
> > be
> > possible to install the required fonts, but I haven't found a
> > solution
> > that way, yet. 
> > 
> > Nevertheless, the following should work, and may be a better
> > solution
> > anyway, given that embedding the fonts is probably more cross-
> > platform/viewer friendly: 
> > 
> > 
> > You can embed the fonts if you have Ghostscript installed (I think
> > it
> > comes with Fedora already(?) if not then: 
> > 
> > sudo dnf install ghostscript 
> > 
> > )
> > 
> > 
> > You can then use the embedFonts() function in R:
> > 
> > (pdfil <- paste0("plotmath-example_R",
> >                  with(R.version, paste0(major, sub("[.]", "",
> > minor))),
> > ".pdf"))
> > 
> > pdf(pdfil)
> > example(plotmath); mtext(R.version.string)
> > dev.off()
> > 
> > # Use embedFonts to embed the fonts in the PDF
> > embedFonts(file = pdfil, outfile = paste0("embedded-example",
> > pdfil),
> > options = "-dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress")
> > 
> > 
> > if(interactive()) {
> >   system(paste("evince", paste0("embedded-example", pdfil), "&"))
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Or you can do it in the terminal:
> > 
> > 
> > gs -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -
> > dEmbedAllFonts=true -sOutputFile=plotmath-example-
> > output_embedded.pdf -
> > f plotmath-example_R432.pdf 
> > 
> > 
> > Compare: 
> > 
> > 
> > Embedded:
> > 
> > ❯ pdffonts plotmath-example-output_embedded.pdf
> > name                   type     encoding emb sub uni object ID
> > ---------------------- -------- -------- --- --- --- ------ ---
> > KHEPSB+Helvetica       Type 1C  Custom   yes yes no      10   0
> > WNPVSJ+Symbol          Type 1C  Custom   yes yes no      12   0
> > MQBKOK+Helvetica-Bold  Type 1C  WinAnsi  yes yes no      20   0
> > 
> > 
> > Original:
> > 
> > ❯ pdffonts plotmath-example_R432.pdf
> > name                   type     encoding emb sub uni object ID
> > ---------------------- -------- -------- --- --- --- ------ ---
> > Helvetica              Type 1   Custom   no  no  no      16  0
> > Helvetica-Bold         Type 1   Custom   no  no  no      17  0
> > Symbol                 Type 1   Symbol   no  no  no      18  0
> > 
> > 
> > I hope this works for you. Like I said, I *think* it's a problem
> > with
> > Evince so it's probably better to file a bug report with them, but
> > I
> > also think embedding fonts isn't such a bad idea anyway - you'll
> > know
> > the output will display as intended regardless of the viewer on the
> > user's system. It does lead to a larger file-size, but I think
> > these
> > days we can live with that.
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Peter
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 14:15 +0100, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > > > > > > > Tim Taylor 
> > > > > > > >     on Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:42:35 +0000 writes:
> > > 
> > >     > Hi Martin
> > >     > Probably not the answer you're looking for but on the
> > > latest
> > > Fedora 39 (workstation edition) both locally, and on a freshly
> > > installed VM (with just R-core installed), all fonts render
> > > correctly
> > > for me in evince.
> > > 
> > >     > $ evince --version
> > >     > GNOME Document Viewer 45.0
> > > 
> > >     > $ R --version
> > >     > R version 4.3.3 (2024-02-29) -- "Angel Food Cake"
> > >     > Copyright (C) 2024 The R Foundation for Statistical
> > > Computing
> > >     > Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> > > 
> > >     > It may be worth sharing more details about your
> > > installation
> > > (e.g. Fedora version) to see if anyone has any ideas.
> > > 
> > >     > Tim
> > > 
> > > Thank you, Tim.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Fedora is 38 :
> > > 
> > > $ lsb_release -a
> > > LSB Version:  :core-5.0-amd64:core-5.0-noarch:cxx-5.0-amd64:cxx-
> > > 5.0-noarch:desktop-5.0-amd64:desktop-5.0-noarch:languages-5.0-
> > > amd64:languages-5.0-noarch:printing-5.0-amd64:printing-5.0-noarch
> > > Distributor ID:       Fedora
> > > Description:  Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight)
> > > Release:      38
> > > Codename:     ThirtyEight
> > > 
> > > $ evince --version
> > > GNOME Document Viewer 44.3
> > > 
> > > R version does not matter at all.
> > > Same phenomenon in several versions of R I have installed
> > > simultaneously (from source).
> > > As I mentioned, I'm slightly misusing the list for non-R problem
> > > that I encounter a lot with R  {because I like to use
> > > "plotmath"}, so I apologize in advance.
> > > 
> > > Maybe it's rather a matter of fonts installed in
> > > /usr/share/fonts/ ??
> > > 
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > >     > On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, at 10:51 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > >     >> This problem has bugged me for several years now,
> > >     >> and our own IT staff has tried a few things, but then
> > > never
> > >     >> cared enough to persist fixing it.
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> It *is* a bug in evince, the standard pdf viewer on Fedora
> > > and
> > >     >> IIUC also quite few other Linux distributions, and
> > >     >> *not* a bug in R;  hence I am asking for help/hints here.
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> A very simple example:
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > -----------------
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> (pdfil <- paste0("plotmath-example_R",
> > >     >> with(R.version, paste0(major, sub("[.]", "", minor))),
> > > ".pdf"))
> > >     >> ## "plomath-example_R433.pdf"
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> pdf(pdfil)
> > >     >> example(plotmath); mtext(R.version.string)
> > >     >> dev.off()
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> if(interactive())
> > >     >> system(paste("evince", pdfil, "&"))
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > -----------------
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> The pdf contains 4 pages, and in all of them *some* of the
> > > math
> > >     >> symbols are replaced by open rectangles -- because evince
> > > does
> > >     >> not find the fonts it should.
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> E.g.
> > >     >> - page 1: \pi is properly shown,  \phi not
> > >     >> - page 2: all greek letters,  \theta, \xi, \eta  are *not*
> > > shown
> > >     >> ...
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> Simply typing
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> example(plotmath)
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> in the R console will show you everything as it should be
> > > but
> > > is
> > >     >> not for us, using evince.
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> However, *everything* is rendered correctly, if I use very
> > > old
> > >     >> 'xpdf' {which you may have to install
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> ## OTOH: This always work fine with the very old  'xpdf' :
> > >     >> system(paste("xpdf", pdfil, "&"))
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> So the fonts *are* somewhere on my machine, but evince
> > > does
> > > not
> > >     >> find them;
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> How should our IT people fix this?
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> IIRC they did install the Zapf Dingbats fonts -- which
> > > then
> > > are
> > >     >> found by xpdf but not by evince ?
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> Thank you in advance,
> > >     >> Martin
> > >     >> 
> > >     >> _______________________________________________
> > >     >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > >     >> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
> > >     >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
> > >     >> 
> > > 
> > >     > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
> > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
> 
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Úcar


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora

Reply via email to