Thanks for the confirmation, Brian. I wasn't aware that Gtk+2 was abandoned for so long - then our 2.24.17 binaries are in fact quite reasonable and I'll go with that. Thanks, Simon
> On 4/04/2020, at 9:11 PM, Prof Brian Ripley <rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 04/04/2020 05:15, Tom Elliott wrote: >> Simon, >>> Hence this is a call to the R community to see if anyone actually cares. >> I (and Chris Wild and quite a few of our mac users) care and would greatly >> appreciate working GTK+ CRAN packages! >> I don't have any knowledge re source etc, but just to remind you that the >> current RGtk2 package on CRAN for 3.3 doesn't work (or at least wasn't when >> I last tried): >> library(RGtk2) >> gtkHScaleNewWithRange(0, 5, 1) # segfault > > Did you really mean '3.3'? If so, R versions that old are long unsupported. > > FWIW, your example worked for me with 4.0.0 alpha and RGtk2 built from source > against Simon's (old) build of GTK+ 2.24.17. Have you tried that? RGtk2 > and some of the packages using it pass their checks but some (e.g. > gWidgets2RGtk2 and a few of those using it including MixSIAR, Ricetl, fit4NM, > plfMA) segfault. And this has been the case for several years. > > -- > Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk > Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
