On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Todd A. Johnson wrote: > I've failed so far at getting R 2.6.0 (R-devel) to build as 64-bit > on my Mac Pro under Leopard, but at the moment I don't have time to > detail my errors. >
Then why should we take any time to respond? > The simple question at the moment, since I was wondering if it might > impact > building of this and other programs is the 4-architecture binary of > gfortran > on the r.research.att.com website. If you install it and run "file > /usr/local/bin/gfortran-4.2" in the Terminal, it reports a "Mach-O > executable i386" and a "Mach-O executable ppc". > > Shouldn't "file" also report a ppc64 and an x86_64 executable if > it's for > 4-architectures? No. > That was the case for other programs that I've installed > that were for 4-archs. > > Also, could someone please provide: > > 1) Date of latest successfully building R-Devel for 64-bit on > Leopard. It seemed like my errors were different for different > dates, so it seemed possible to me that new additions, irrespective > of Leopard issues, to this alpha development release could cause > things to fail...? > No. R-devel compiles just fine and it did so for quite a while. (FWIW: R-2.6-branch compiles now, too.) > 2) working configure commmands (in other words, should I still just > be > typing in what's listed for building 64-bit R on Simon's web-site? > with > changing "8.8.1" to "9.0.0") > The configure "command" supplied with R works just fine. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
