Eh, well, I think Ted Nelson is a little miffed (somewhat rightfully) at 
not getting credit for his vision. But I keep remembering that Xanadu, 
much like OpenDoc in the 90s, never got off the ground. A big part of 
that was because it was too complex to implement: Xanadu would have 
required not only inventing complex new protocols, but convincing people 
to adopt them.

HTML+HTTP is "bad hypertext", by one way of thinking, but it has the 
great virtue of being really, really cheap to implement. That's what 
Berners-Lee wanted: Basically a smarter Gopher. Something you could 
teach a physicist to work in a few minutes of explanation.

The "one-way link" also has the great virtue of not requiring someone's 
approval or blessing before you link to them. It would be a radically 
different web -- much more "closed", and thus probably would not have 
excited people nearly as much.


Pat Rapp wrote:
> Tornado-like destruction? Did I sleep through a tornado?
> Sounds like this guy is a little grumpy.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alicia Henn" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 6:34 PM
> Subject: It could have been so different
>
>
>
> Here's an interesting article about Theodor Holm Nelson, an early
> intellect in the creation of the world wide web.
>
> "One-way links can be easily broken, and there is no simple way to
> preserve authorship and credit, as was possible with a project called
> Xanadu that Mr. Nelson began in the 1960s. His two-way links might
> have avoided the Web’s tornado-like destruction of the economic value
> of the printed word, he has contended, by incorporating a system of
> micropayments."
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11stream.html?th&emc=th
>
>
>
>
> >
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to