On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:08 PM Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sep 14, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Vincent St-Amour < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Do you mean that the style guide refers to unstable? A quick grep didn't > > find anything. > > > > Or do you mean that the style guide should keep a discussion of > > unstable-related workflows? I would say no, since we're now discouraging > > these workflows. > > > Yes. If you want to keep unstable, the style guide should mention the life > cycle of unstable ideas. > > [[ May I ask whether Eli was right about unstable? ]] > The `unstable` collection served a very useful purpose, but now that we have a package system and a split repository, it's not longer needed in the way that it was. Which is why it's great that Vincent has cleaned it up. Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAK%3DHD%2BYD33-Lhm-4Mj9U3UoQyWaSumz7a3oJtouU-cVz6LOgLw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
