I think we should actually list the package content on a page that comes with the docs and make it immediately indexable (even if not installed). When I then run
raco doc fancy-data-structure I may have a fighting change that it says available as package FancyDataFooBar from package server. And I go off and install it. -- Matthias On Sep 15, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Laurent <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 Sep 2015 12:15 am, "Vincent St-Amour" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Many of what used to be unstable subcollects now live on as independent > > packages, which makes them more discoverable, and removes the specter of > > unstability. > > > > A lot of the rest have been merged with the relevant portions of the > > standard library, also making them more discoverable, and less "risky" > > to use. > > Although I also think unstable is now not as useful as it was, I would argue > against the "more discoverable" argument: I used to have a look at the > unstable docs now and then to look for new interesting bindings but now I > wouldn't know where to look. > > More general suggestion: > Maybe it would be nice to have, on the pkg webpage or at least maybe through > raco, the list of new bindings per package and per collection, with a > reference point like 1 week, 1 month and 6 months for example. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/E9850853-787C-4891-9A9C-F07076D7F900%40ccs.neu.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
