On 2015-10-30 13:39:48 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> For the unstable changes, how much detail do we want? Listing the fate
> of each of the 40+ unstable subcollects is probably too much, but just
> saying "unstable is out of the distribution, some of its goodies have
> been merged" is probably too little. Any thoughts?

How about blogging in detail about the changes and then just linking to the
blog entry? (in addition to that short blurb)

Cheers,
Asumu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20151030184439.GU17250%40simplyrobot.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to