Asumu Takikawa wrote on 10/30/2015 02:44 PM:
On 2015-10-30 13:39:48 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
For the unstable changes, how much detail do we want? Listing the fate
of each of the 40+ unstable subcollects is probably too much, but just
saying "unstable is out of the distribution, some of its goodies have
been merged" is probably too little. Any thoughts?
How about blogging in detail about the changes and then just linking to the
blog entry? (in addition to that short blurb)
What Asumu said, except that one time-honored engineering convention
would be for the detail to go into the release notes (in whatever form
that the release notes are currently kept).
If you wanted to, you could *also* put the detail into a blog entry, in
addition to in the release notes, but the release notes would be the
normative reference, and the blog entry would link to the release notes.
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5633BE2D.10208%40neilvandyke.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
