On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:06:16 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Jay's explanation sounds right to me. > > Naturally, we've wanted to move more code out of C for a long time. I > think the pieces are finally moving into place so that it will really > start to happen over the next year or so (but it's always difficult to > predict). > > FWIW, I'm puzzled by the behavior of `find . -name \*.rkt | xargs wc`, > but using > > (for/fold ([n 0]) ([f (in-directory)] > #:when (regexp-match? #rx"[.]rkt$" f)) > (+ n (length (file->lines f)))) > > on the v6.3 source distribution, I get > > .c: 308,651 (where roughly 10% is a GC that we don't use anymore) > .h: 54,424 > .rkt: 823,030
I think maybe an xargs limit is being reached or something - when I scroll up, I see another total line is displayed for .rkt, so it's: 779,431 43,544 For a total of 822,975 Racket lines. Sorry for the confusion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5e401a04-6fdc-4e77-b76d-20cf83a3449d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
