> > FWIW, http://www.dwheeler.com/sloccount/ might be a better way to > accomplish this once it supports Racket detection. I just opened a feature > request for that at > https://sourceforge.net/p/sloccount/feature-requests/20/ and am hoping > there is interest. >
You could also use sloc [1], which already supports Racket. Or just trust github's count (47.6% Racket, 34% C at [2]) [1] https://github.com/flosse/sloc [2] https://github.com/racket/racket -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAFUu9R5%2BbaQ6%3DnX%3D971vxTK7BQqwnV%3DUDoDb8K4cAcpywvhe-A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
