> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll work on this as soon as I can. Meanwhile, you might have intended > for "functional-lib" to depend on "collections-lib", and it's possible > that change avoid the bug in the dependency calculation.
Wonderful, thank you for the explanation! No rush on fixing it, since you are indeed right: I only recently split my collections package into lib/doc/test, and I apparently forgot to update functional to depend on the split out variants, which triggered the issue. I’ve fixed functional-lib now, so if that works fine, it should be fixed for the time being, anyway. Thanks again, Alexis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/718A9546-DF32-4158-9239-F1BC2E74E651%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
