On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Butterick <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Would you consider a PR (from me) for `parser-tools` that updates the > names to be consistent (while preserving the older ones of course)? Or is > there too much water under the bridge to bother with?
Sure, cleaning up stuff like that sounds quite welcome. And the parser tools could use a lot of clean up, I believe. They are kind of strange and klunky compared to modern racket. > 2) Relatedly: is the field ordering used by the `srcloc` struct — line / > column / position / span — recommended for other interfaces to follow, or > considered arbitrary? I would probably say "both". Robby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAL3TdOOnPYmtjH0cvoTTtQOFef%2BBpOnQtXwSyt0m%3D5fdG6iA7w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
