On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 10:25:06 AM UTC-8, robby wrote: > > > Sure, cleaning up stuff like that sounds quite welcome. And the parser > tools could use a lot of clean up, I believe. They are kind of strange > and klunky compared to modern racket. >
What expectation of backward compatibility is baked into `parser-tools`? How much modernization is acceptable? IOW, suppose I've added a `lexer-srcloc` variant of `lexer-src-pos` that uses srcloc structs rather than the "strange and klunky" structures currently used by `parser-tools`. But that creates a dependency on the `srcloc` structure in modern Racket, which might annoy the MzScheme v372 community. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/7e294813-1d8f-43c3-a80d-94f9ae0af574%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
